|
School LAND Trust Program
| Person responsible for implementing the plan: |
| Name: | BECKMAN, KENT |
District: | North Summit |
| Email: | kbeckman@dsdmail.net |
School: | Hillcrest EL |
| Position: | principal |
| |
Academic Plan Proposal and Report for 2004-2005
1. During the 2004-2005 school year, the School Community Council met:
2. Did the committee view the video "Using the Trust?"
3. Duration of the plan:
4. School's most critical academic need(s):
| Identified in the plan |
Indentified by the report |
|
|
|
5. Plan description
We are tremendously encouraged by the success shown in our media check out
over the past years and our reading audiences. More children are reading
more books. We want to continue our AR help in the Media Center (hired on
T/A) to help check in/out books, to help with testing, and to order new
books and tests. Trust Land supports our school plan where we've
identified reading as our primary focus. Our measure will be based on
circulation of books, increased reading scores, and parent surveys of how
they see their child's motivation to read on level and read more often.
|
6. Report description
- Explanation of implementation and progress
Using CRT results we compared 2003 with 2004 and found the overall school's
percentages are down by several percentage points- we still maintained good
progress towards our goals. We continue to use strategies of Language Arts
reading and writing skills for improvement. Math in problem solving and
computation are strategies used by all teachers. Our Language Arts CRT
reflected 68% of our students were proficient in 2004. Our subpopulations
improved from 59% to 63% Our Math CRT's stayed the same from last year 64%
of our students being proficient. Our subpopulation did show increase. All
considered we did meet AYP in 2004. We will continue to focus on reading
comprehension and writing for goals in 2005.
|
- Measurement of student improvement
On the CRT for Language Arts 68% of our students in grades 3-6 were in the
proficient range in 2004. This was 3 % points higher that the state
proficiency goal of 65%. Our 'Economically Disadvantaged' subpopulation
showed an improvement of four percentage points scoring 63% proficient in
2004 compared to 59% in 2003. Our 'Students with disabilities' also
improved three percentage points scoring 25% proficient in 2004 up from 22%
in 2003. These subpopulations were designated with 'Yes' under the
statistical significance test. Our Math goals: CRT scores showed our school
as a whole stayed consistent at 64% proficient in 2004 and 2003. This is
seven percentage points above the state minimum of 57%. Our subpopulations
did show improvement. The 'Economically Disadvantaged' subpopulation show
58% proficient in 2004 compared to 53% proficient in 2003. This is one
percentage point higher than state proficiency goal of 57%. 'Students with
Disabilities' has 31% proficient in 2004 up from 29% in 2003. This latter
subpopulation received 'Yes' under the statistical significance test. All
of this help Fremont to meet the AYP requirements of 2004.
|
- Impact of funds on students
The Trust Lands program is an important source of funding for highly
impacted schools. At Fremont Elementary, we were able to...
1. purchase books for the library.
2. purchase Accelerated Reader tests for these new books.
3. pay additional help to process these books in and mark them for
Accelerated Reader - thus making these books an important part of our school
literacy program.
4. purchase an additional book scanner for the library.
None of these purchases would have been possible without the Trust Lands
budget.
Thank you.
|
7. Financial proposal and report
| Available funds |
Plan(estimates) | Report(actual) |
|
Distribution for 2004-2005 |
$6397 | $7235 |
| | Carry-over from 2003-2004 |
$90 | $369 |
| | Total available for expenditure | $6487 | $7604 |
| Expenditures |
| |
| | Salaries and Employee Benefits |
$3000 | $6017 |
| | Professional Development / Technical Services |
$0 | $765 |
| | Repairs and Maintenance |
$0 | $0 |
| | Travel / Admissions /Printing |
$0 | $0 |
| | Supplies / Textbooks / Library / Software |
$1200 | $763 |
| | Technology / Equipment |
$2250 | $0 |
| | Total Expenditures | $6450 | $7545 |
| | Remaining Funds |
$37 | $59 |
8. Were a substantial portion of funds spent for remediation?
9. How the plan related to the School Improvement Plan
Trust Lands is one part of the larger School Improvement Plan. Trust Land
funding helps support the reading component with a budget to do things
outside what is usually available. We want to meet 'Adequate Yearly
Progress' reading standards.
|
10. Additional funds that have been identified to implement the plan
| Amount: | $2000 |
| Source: | school fund raisers |
11. The council sent letters explaining the school plan to:
- Governor Jon Huntsman Jr.
- Utah Sen. Dist. 21 - Sheldon Killpack
- Local School Board - Barbara Smith
|
12. The school plan was advertised to the community in the following ways:
- Letters to state senators, representatives, governor, and congressional delegation
- Local newspaper
- School newsletter
- School assembly
|
Academic Plan Proposal for 2005-2006
1. Did the committee view the video "Using the Trust?"
2. Duration of the plan:
3. School's most critical academic need(s):
4. Plan description
- How the money will be spent to improve academic performace
Word processing for:1. Student writing and comprehension.
2. Accelerated Reader for comprehension in reading.
3. STAR testing as a reading assessment tool.
4. Presentations by both students and teachers as teaching tools.
5. Internet for additional information and activities for instruction.
6. ILS.
|
- Goals for student improvement
Reading: Based on CRT data we will improve reading comprehension skills by
teaching comprehension strategies in the content area.
Writing: Based on CRT data we will improve writing skills by teaching
writing strategies in the content area.
|
- How improvement is assessed or measured
Iowa Test of Basic Skills (ITBS), 1-3 Stanford Diagnostic Reading Test
(SDRT), State Criterion Referenced Tests (CRTs).
|
5. How the plan relates to the School Improvement Plan
6. Financial proposal
| Available funds |
Plan Estimates |
| |
School LAND Trust funds for 2005-2006 |
$7893 |
| |
Carry-over from 2004-2005 |
$987 |
| |
Total available for expenditure |
$8880 |
| Expenditures |
|
| | Professional Development |
$0 |
| | Computers / Microscopes / Calculators / Repairs / Maintenance |
$1000 |
| | Textbooks / Books / Media / Software / Supplies | $5290 |
| | Travel / Admissions / Printing |
$0 |
| | Salaries / Benefits |
$2500 | | | Total Expenditures |
$8790 |
| | Remaining Funds |
$90 |
7. Additional funds that have been identified to implement the plan
| Amount: | $14700 |
| Source: | TAP Funds $14,700 |
8. The school plan will be advertised to the community in the following ways:
- Letters to state senators, representatives, governor, and congressional delegation
Local newspaperSchool newsletterSchool assemblyOther
| |
|