School LAND Trust Program - Learning and Nurturing Development with Trustland Dividends Logged in as:
Hillcrest EL (North Summit District)

Logout


Return to Home Page

Submit or Edit
Plans & Councils
View Plans
& Councils
Funding Plan Approval Dates General
Information
Help

School LAND Trust Program

Person responsible for implementing the plan:
Name:BECKMAN, KENT District: North Summit
Email:kbeckman@dsdmail.net School: Hillcrest EL
Position:principal
 

Academic Plan Proposal and Report for 2004-2005

1. During the 2004-2005 school year, the School Community Council met:
More Than 6 Times

2. Did the committee view the video "Using the Trust?"
Yes

3. Duration of the plan:
Single Year

4. School's most critical academic need(s):
Identified in the plan Indentified by the report
  • Reading
  • Mathematics
  • Reading
  • Writing

5. Plan description
We are tremendously encouraged by the success shown in our media check out
over the past years and our reading audiences. More children are reading
more books. We want to continue our AR help in the Media Center (hired on
T/A) to help check in/out books, to help with testing, and to order new
books and tests. Trust Land supports our school plan where we've
identified reading as our primary focus. Our measure will be based on
circulation of books, increased reading scores, and parent surveys of how
they see their child's motivation to read on level and read more often.

6. Report description

  • Explanation of implementation and progress
    Using CRT results we compared 2003 with 2004 and found the overall
    school's
    percentages are down by several percentage points- we still maintained good
    progress towards our goals. We continue to use strategies of Language Arts
    reading and writing skills for improvement. Math in problem solving and
    computation are strategies used by all teachers. Our Language Arts CRT
    reflected 68% of our students were proficient in 2004. Our subpopulations
    improved from 59% to 63% Our Math CRT's stayed the same from last year 64%
    of our students being proficient. Our subpopulation did show increase. All
    considered we did meet AYP in 2004. We will continue to focus on reading
    comprehension and writing for goals in 2005.
  • Measurement of student improvement
    On the CRT for Language Arts 68% of our students in grades 3-6 were in the
    proficient range in 2004. This was 3 % points higher that the state
    proficiency goal of 65%. Our 'Economically Disadvantaged' subpopulation
    showed an improvement of four percentage points scoring 63% proficient in
    2004 compared to 59% in 2003. Our 'Students with disabilities' also
    improved three percentage points scoring 25% proficient in 2004 up from 22%
    in 2003. These subpopulations were designated with 'Yes' under the
    statistical significance test. Our Math goals: CRT scores showed our school
    as a whole stayed consistent at 64% proficient in 2004 and 2003. This is
    seven percentage points above the state minimum of 57%. Our subpopulations
    did show improvement. The 'Economically Disadvantaged' subpopulation
    show
    58% proficient in 2004 compared to 53% proficient in 2003. This is one
    percentage point higher than state proficiency goal of 57%. 'Students
    with
    Disabilities' has 31% proficient in 2004 up from 29% in 2003. This latter
    subpopulation received 'Yes' under the statistical significance test. All
    of this help Fremont to meet the AYP requirements of 2004.
  • Impact of funds on students
    The Trust Lands program is an important source of funding for highly
    impacted schools. At Fremont Elementary, we were able to...

    1. purchase books for the library.

    2. purchase Accelerated Reader tests for these new books.

    3. pay additional help to process these books in and mark them for
    Accelerated Reader - thus making these books an important part of our
    school
    literacy program.

    4. purchase an additional book scanner for the library.

    None of these purchases would have been possible without the Trust Lands
    budget.

    Thank you.

7. Financial proposal and report
Available funds Plan(estimates)Report(actual)
  Distribution for 2004-2005 $6397$7235
 Carry-over from 2003-2004 $90$369
 Total available for expenditure$6487$7604
Expenditures   
 Salaries and Employee Benefits $3000$6017
 Professional Development / Technical Services $0$765
 Repairs and Maintenance $0$0
 Travel / Admissions /Printing $0$0
 Supplies / Textbooks / Library / Software $1200$763
 Technology / Equipment $2250$0
 Total Expenditures $6450$7545
 Remaining Funds $37$59

8. Were a substantial portion of funds spent for remediation?
Yes

9. How the plan related to the School Improvement Plan
Trust Lands is one part of the larger School Improvement Plan. Trust Land
funding helps support the reading component with a budget to do things
outside what is usually available. We want to meet 'Adequate Yearly
Progress' reading standards.

10. Additional funds that have been identified to implement the plan
Amount:  $2000
Source:  school fund raisers

11. The council sent letters explaining the school plan to:
  • Governor Jon Huntsman Jr.
  • Utah Sen. Dist. 21 - Sheldon Killpack
  • Local School Board - Barbara Smith

12. The school plan was advertised to the community in the following ways:
  • Letters to state senators, representatives, governor, and congressional delegation
  • Local newspaper
  • School newsletter
  • School assembly

Academic Plan Proposal for 2005-2006

1. Did the committee view the video "Using the Trust?"
Yes

2. Duration of the plan:
Multi-Year

3. School's most critical academic need(s):
  • Reading
  • Writing

4. Plan description

  • How the money will be spent to improve academic performace
    Word processing for:1. Student writing and comprehension.
    2. Accelerated Reader for comprehension in reading.
    3. STAR testing as a reading assessment tool.
    4. Presentations by both students and teachers as teaching tools.
    5. Internet for additional information and activities for instruction.
    6. ILS.
  • Goals for student improvement
    Reading: Based on CRT data we will improve reading comprehension skills by
    teaching comprehension strategies in the content area.
    Writing: Based on CRT data we will improve writing skills by teaching
    writing strategies in the content area.
  • How improvement is assessed or measured
    Iowa Test of Basic Skills (ITBS), 1-3 Stanford Diagnostic Reading Test
    (SDRT), State Criterion Referenced Tests (CRTs).

5. How the plan relates to the School Improvement Plan
Trust Lands is embedded entirely in the school improvement plan.

http://www.davis.k12.ut.us/rad/sip/07133.pdf

6. Financial proposal
Available funds Plan Estimates
  School LAND Trust funds for 2005-2006 $7893
  Carry-over from 2004-2005 $987
  Total available for expenditure $8880
Expenditures  
 Professional Development $0
 Computers / Microscopes / Calculators / Repairs / Maintenance $1000
 Textbooks / Books / Media / Software / Supplies$5290
 Travel / Admissions / Printing $0
 Salaries / Benefits $2500
 Total Expenditures $8790
 Remaining Funds $90

7. Additional funds that have been identified to implement the plan
Amount:  $14700
Source:  TAP Funds $14,700

8. The school plan will be advertised to the community in the following ways:
  • Letters to state senators, representatives, governor, and congressional delegationLocal newspaperSchool newsletterSchool assemblyOther