|
School LAND Trust Program
| Person responsible for implementing the plan: |
| Name: | HOLT, DONALD |
District: | North Summit |
| Email: | dholt@dsdmail.net |
School: | Ellison Park EL |
| Position: | principal |
| |
Academic Plan Proposal and Report for 2004-2005
1. During the 2004-2005 school year, the School Community Council met:
2. Did the committee view the video "Using the Trust?"
3. Duration of the plan:
4. School's most critical academic need(s):
| Identified in the plan |
Indentified by the report |
- Reading
- Writing
- Mathematics
- Science
|
- Reading
- Writing
- Mathematics
- Health
|
5. Plan description
Trust Land funding will be used to support continuation of our efforts
toward school improvement as demonstrated by Adequate Yearly Progress in:
Writing instruction, including teacher training, author visits, staff
development in Six Traits Writing.
Reading, including purchase of additional books and quizzes for
Accelerated Reader.
Mathematics instruction, including the purchase of software and
manipulatives.
Science instruction, including the purchase of science equipment and staff
development in teaching the state core curriculum.
Life skills and character education.
|
6. Report description
- Explanation of implementation and progress
Creekside's report of Adequate Yearly Progress for 2004 shows that we have
met the goal in each of the following: Our Attendance goal of 93% was
exceeded by 3%.Our Whole School CRT scores show that we exceeded state goals
by 20 percentage points in Math and 17 in Language Arts. In each
subpopulation: Asian, African American, Caucasian, Hispanic, Economically
Disadvantaged, Limited English Proficient, and Students with Disabilities,
the school achieved a YES or a YES* for AYP. Creekside students were
referred to the office for disciplinary concerns less than half as often
this year as last.
|
- Measurement of student improvement
Creekside Elementary School achieved Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) in both
language arts and mathematics. In the Math CRT for 2004 Creekside students
scored 77% proficient, which is up from 74% in 2003 and some 20 percentage
points higher than the state proficiency goal. Subpopulation performance
shows the Caucasian group scoring 80% proficient, up from 76% last year.
All other subpopulations were designated Yes under the statistical test.
Language Arts CRT results indicate that 82% of Creekside students scored
proficient, 17 percentage points above the state proficiency goal.
Subpopulation performance on the Language Arts CRT indicates 85% proficiency
among the Caucasian subpopulation, with all other subpopulations designated
Yes under the statistical test.
|
- Impact of funds on students
Consistent with priorities and objectives of our school improvement plan,
Creekside Elementary School provided students these opportunities, equipment
and materials through Trust Lands funding. The school would not have been
able to provide these were it not for Trust Lands funds. A new state-of-the
art computer lab capable of operating SuccessMaker, an Integrated Learning
System ($8,000) The design and delivery of "Comet" the Dragon, our
school's mascot, together with life skills incentives ($1477) Classroom
sets of calculators to replace dated, worn-out and non-functioning ones
($1365) Author visits, assemblies, book signings, and activities with
students and the school community ($1132) Additional Accelerated Reader
quizzes to enhance and expand school testing capabilities ($1016) New books
for the school library ($628) Life Skills and Character Education Reference
books ($110)
|
7. Financial proposal and report
| Available funds |
Plan(estimates) | Report(actual) |
|
Distribution for 2004-2005 |
$12763 | $ |
| | Carry-over from 2003-2004 |
$1301 | $ |
| | Total available for expenditure | $14064 | $0 |
| Expenditures |
| |
| | Salaries and Employee Benefits |
$1500 | $0 |
| | Professional Development / Technical Services |
$2000 | $0 |
| | Repairs and Maintenance |
$0 | $0 |
| | Travel / Admissions /Printing |
$2500 | $0 |
| | Supplies / Textbooks / Library / Software |
$6000 | $0 |
| | Technology / Equipment |
$2000 | $0 |
| | Total Expenditures | $14000 | $0 |
| | Remaining Funds |
$64 | $0 |
8. Were a substantial portion of funds spent for remediation?
9. How the plan related to the School Improvement Plan
This plan is based on both the District and the school plans for fostering
educational excellence. It is the mission of Creekside Elementary School
to assist students in developing the knowledge, skills and traits of
character essential to their lifelong success.
|
10. Additional funds that have been identified to implement the plan
11. The council sent letters explaining the school plan to:
- Governor Jon Huntsman Jr.
- U.S. Sen. Orrin Hatch
- U.S. Sen. Bob Bennett
- U.S. Rep. Rob Bishop
- U.S. Rep. Jim Matheson
- U.S. Rep. Chris Cannon
- Utah Sen. Dist. 14 - John L. Valentine
- Utah Sen. Dist. 23 - Dan R. Eastman
- Utah Rep. Dist. 49 - Greg J. Curtis
|
12. The school plan was advertised to the community in the following ways:
- Letters to state senators, representatives, governor, and congressional delegation
- Local newspaper
- School newsletter
- Other
|
Academic Plan Proposal for 2005-2006
1. Did the committee view the video "Using the Trust?"
2. Duration of the plan:
3. School's most critical academic need(s):
- Reading
- Writing
- Mathematics
- Health
|
4. Plan description
- How the money will be spent to improve academic performace
Teachers will use technology to integrate instruction through use of
electronic research, word processing, editing, computer-assisted publishing,
etc. The Houghton Mifflin website will be used to reinforce language arts
instruction. Students will be encouraged to write and publish their own
compositions. Teachers will encourage students to use Accelerated Reader to
improve their reading skills, broaden their reading experience, and extend
their knowledge base. Curriculum-based websites will also be used to
supplement classroom instruction, extend student knowledge, and reinforce
skill development. Calculators, electronic presentations, and other tools of
technology will enhance instruction. The school is now purchasing the
necessary equipment to operate Success Maker, an integrated learning system
that will provide instructional support to students.
|
- Goals for student improvement
Reading: Students will learn at their instructional level and achieve AYP
in Reading as measured by CRT and DESK report data.
Writing: Students will learn at their instructional level and achieve AYP
in Writing as measured by CRT and DESK report data.
Mathematics: Students will learn at their instructional level and achieve
AYP in Math as measured by CRT and DESK report data.
Non-Academic: Students will be in attendance a minimum of 93% of the school
year.
Health: Students will participate in regular physical fitness activities
and will develop habits of sound nutrition.
|
- How improvement is assessed or measured
Iowa Test of Basic Skills (ITBS), 1-3 Stanford Diagnostic Reading Test
(SDRT), State Criterion Referenced Tests (CRTs).
|
5. How the plan relates to the School Improvement Plan
6. Financial proposal
| Available funds |
Plan Estimates |
| |
School LAND Trust funds for 2005-2006 |
$15386 |
| |
Carry-over from 2004-2005 |
$2897 |
| |
Total available for expenditure |
$18283 |
| Expenditures |
|
| | Professional Development |
$1200 |
| | Computers / Microscopes / Calculators / Repairs / Maintenance |
$0 |
| | Textbooks / Books / Media / Software / Supplies | $15782 |
| | Travel / Admissions / Printing |
$0 |
| | Salaries / Benefits |
$0 | | | Total Expenditures |
$16982 |
| | Remaining Funds |
$1301 |
7. Additional funds that have been identified to implement the plan
| Amount: | $17680 |
| Source: | TAP (Technology Advancement Plan) $17,680 |
8. The school plan will be advertised to the community in the following ways:
- Letters to state senators, representatives, governor, and congressional delegation
School newsletterOther
| |
|