School LAND Trust Program - Learning and Nurturing Development with Trustland Dividends Logged in as:
Ellison Park EL (Davis District)

Logout


Return to Home Page

Submit or Edit
Plans & Councils
View Plans
& Councils
Funding Plan Approval Dates General
Information
Help

School LAND Trust Program

Person responsible for implementing the plan:
Name:TIMOTHY, MICHAEL District: Davis
Email:mtimothy@dsdmail.net School: Ellison Park EL
Position:principal
 

Academic Plan Proposal and Report for 2004-2005

1. During the 2004-2005 school year, the School Community Council met:
More Than 6 Times

2. Did the committee view the video "Using the Trust?"
Yes

3. Duration of the plan:
Single Year

4. School's most critical academic need(s):
Identified in the plan Indentified by the report
  • Reading
  • Technology
  • Reading
  • Writing

5. Plan description
We will measure our improvement by how well our Students perform on their
end of level tests and their reading tests. We are looking specifically
our
Biological Science classes as we purchased thirty microscopes in the years
past and we are looking at the scores to see if they go up. Our writing
lab
is used every day. Our writing samples are getting better and better. Our
technology students are getting hired doing what they have learned here,
they are leaving here with leveled certification in different areas of
expertise. We had one of our students place third in the state
competition,
due in large part to the up to date technology equipment.

6. Report description

  • Explanation of implementation and progress
    Clearfield High School is making significant progress toward SIP goals.
    Improved student achievement on the CRT in grade 10 Reading Comprehension
    has brought CHS up 2.3 percentage points to the district average, and grade
    11 students also improved. As a whole, the school increased the percentage
    of students classified as proficient in Language Arts by 7 percentage
    points
    with significant progress in Hispanic, Economically Disadvantaged, Limited
    English Proficient and Students with Disabilities.
    Clearfield High School is enjoying a more positive public image as a result
    of explicit and continuous public relations efforts and more focused,
    positive communications between CHS and the community. Continued efforts
    and more data sources will be required next year. Smaller Learning
    Communities are an integral part of Clearfield and will continue to
    influence both the curriculum and the decision-making process at the
    school.
    Professional Learning Communities and Career Academies will be further
    developed. Data gathering and analysis will continue to inform the
    process.
    Highly-qualified teachers are an important ideal at CHS. While only two
    teachers out of ninety-five do not meet the definition, CHS strives to have
    100% teachers highly-qualified.
  • Measurement of student improvement
    1. Clearfield High School used Percent Correct CRT Reports to set reading
    comprehension goals, but because tests change annually, we will need to
    compare CHS average performance to the district average for the same area.
    In 2004 CHS grade 10 students averaged the same score as the district on
    Reading Comprehension. This is a significant gain over 2003 performance
    where CHS grade 10 students lagged behind the district by 2.3 percentage
    points. In 2004 CHS grade 11 students
  • Impact of funds on students
    We were able to provide a reading program that was scientifically based.
    The reading program is Read 180. Along with the software purchased we were
    able to purchase new computers with audio accessories. We also provided
    funding for an additional teacher assistant.

7. Financial proposal and report
Available funds Plan(estimates)Report(actual)
  Distribution for 2004-2005 $31593$
 Carry-over from 2003-2004 $26896$
 Total available for expenditure$58489$0
Expenditures   
 Salaries and Employee Benefits $15000$0
 Professional Development / Technical Services $15000$0
 Repairs and Maintenance $0$0
 Travel / Admissions /Printing $0$0
 Supplies / Textbooks / Library / Software $0$0
 Technology / Equipment $28489$0
 Total Expenditures $58489$0
 Remaining Funds $0$0

8. Were a substantial portion of funds spent for remediation?
Yes

9. How the plan related to the School Improvement Plan
A large component in our School Improvement Plan is reading. We have
chosen Read 180 as our vehicle to help students.Our SIP has set goals for
lowest reading students to improve enough that they would be able to read
well enough to succeed at their grade level as soon as possible. In the 6
months we have been in the Read 180 program the students were just
retested
to see their lexile growth. We would expect growth in a year to be from
75-100 lexiles per year. Our students have shown 186.41 lexiles this
testing period. The great thing about this is not the score, but the fact
we think we can do better for more students.
NOTE: The financial accounting on this form ends up being a miss
representation. I don't know how the money appears here or from where the
input comes from, but my budget at the dist. shows I have about $3,000
left
in my School Land Trust budget.

10. Additional funds that have been identified to implement the plan
Amount:  $0
Source:  none

11. The council sent letters explaining the school plan to:
  • Governor Jon Huntsman Jr.
  • U.S. Sen. Orrin Hatch
  • U.S. Sen. Bob Bennett
  • U.S. Rep. Rob Bishop
  • Utah Sen. Dist. 21 - Sheldon Killpack

12. The school plan was advertised to the community in the following ways:
  • Letters to state senators, representatives, governor, and congressional delegation
  • School newsletter
  • Other

Academic Plan Proposal for 2005-2006

1. Did the committee view the video "Using the Trust?"
Yes

2. Duration of the plan:
Multi-Year

3. School's most critical academic need(s):
  • Reading
  • Writing

4. Plan description

  • How the money will be spent to improve academic performace
    Offer an English class that will integrate technology using a
    scientifically
    based, research-proven curriculum for student success in reading (READ
    180).

    -Students will use the PLATO software for struggling students as well as
    the
    3-6 programs that supports reading, writing and math skills.
    -Students will use spreadsheets such as Microsoft EXCEL to support and
    learn
    greater math and logic skills.
    -Teachers along with other staff members use the projectors to promote
    reading and subject comprehension.
    -Students will acquire reading, writing, and critical thinking skills as
    they create PowerPoint presentations for class room oral report projects
    and
    Senior Projects. Projectors will also be used to facilitate the instruction
    of classmates.
    -As students use the Internet for research, they will be able to acquire
    reading and writing skills that will enable them to summarize the
    information and in turn, use that information in their classroom
    assignments. The addition/modernization of Computers in the Library and
    other areas in the school will facilitate a smoother experience on the
    internet.
  • Goals for student improvement
    Reading: 1. Students will demonstrate a 2% increase each year for the next
    three years as measured by the Language Arts CRT Reading Strategies
    Component.
    Reading: 2. Improve public awareness of CHS and increase positive
    communications by identifying current perceptions as measured annually by
    attitude surveys and promoting a more positive image.
    Non-Academic: 3. Implement Smaller Learning Communities to include all
    incoming sophomores by September 2005.
    Non-Academic: 4. Progress towards a goal to have 100% of teachers meet the
    DSD definition of 'highly qualified' by September 2006.
    Writing: 5. All teachers will add one additional writing assignment for
    students SY 2004-05.
  • How improvement is assessed or measured
    We will use the accreditation process, along with Iowa Test of Basic Skills
    (ITBS) and Criterion Referenced Tests (CRTs).

5. How the plan relates to the School Improvement Plan
The school improvement plan is Trust Lands.

http://www.davis.k12.ut.us/rad/sip/07706.pdf

6. Financial proposal
Available funds Plan Estimates
  School LAND Trust funds for 2005-2006 $43034
  Carry-over from 2004-2005 $43498
  Total available for expenditure $86532
Expenditures  
 Professional Development $0
 Computers / Microscopes / Calculators / Repairs / Maintenance $20129
 Textbooks / Books / Media / Software / Supplies$39507
 Travel / Admissions / Printing $0
 Salaries / Benefits $0
 Total Expenditures $59636
 Remaining Funds $26896

7. Additional funds that have been identified to implement the plan
Amount:  $26654
Source:  Technology= 26,654

8. The school plan will be advertised to the community in the following ways:
  • Letters to state senators, representatives, governor, and congressional delegationLocal newspaperSchool newsletter