![]() |
Whittier EL - School Plan 2003 - 2004 School LAND Trust Program |
Proposal for 2003-2004
|
District: |
Granite |
|
School: |
Whittier EL |
|
Plan Approved: |
yes |
|
Reviewer: |
pmp for Granite |
|
7. Have you shown the video "Using the Trust" to your committee? | |||
| Yes | If "no", please do so! Click here to order a video | ||
|
8. Duration of the plan: (Plan proposal must be submitted each year) | |||
| Single Year | |||
9. School's
identified most critical academic need(s) addressed in this plan:
Please check only the primary area(s)
|
10. Briefly describe the school plan. Be sure to include:
This box will be displayed on the web and will reflect on your school, so you will want to check your spelling, grammar, and punctuation. The information must fit into this expandable box.
To order stickers to identify purchases you have made through the School LAND Trust Program, Click HereFOCUS AREA 1: Literacy STATEMENT OF NEED: Our school has many below level readers. CRT scores for 2001-2002 show a decrease in 4 out of 6 of the grades. SAT scores show a decreas in 2 out of 3 of the grades. We need to continue support of all grades, continueing to establish programs and projects. MEASURABLE OBJECTIVES: At risk students (below minimum mastery) will show at least a 2% increase on CRT scores. Kindergarten projects will increase at -risk students (achieving below grade level norms) phonics skills by 5%. PLANNED ACTIONS FOR PROFESSIONAL LEARNING: AR training continues. 33 of 34 faculty members attended Summer Core Academy through Utah State University. PLANNED ACTIONS FOR PROJECTS: We will continue with the following projects. School wide implemintation of AR. Summer AR with a special invite to the at-risk population. Summer boost. Kindergarten at-risk before school program. DRA Subs for 1st and 2nd grade. FOCUS AREA 2: Numeracy STATEMENT OF NEED: Our school has seen a decreases in CRT scores in 3 of the 6 grades and decrease in 1 of 3 grades on the SAT. MEASURABLE OBJECTIVES: At-risk students will increase by at least 2% on the CRT's.Kindergarten projects will increase addition, number identification, one-to- one correspondence of numbers and simple subtraction of at-risk Kindergarten student's (achieving below grade level norms) by 5%. PLANNED ACTIONS FOR PROFESSIONAL LEARNING: Teachers will continue to work with the District Math Specialists. Core AcademyK- 6 PLANNED ACTIONS FOR PROJECTS: Summer Boost, Kindergarten at-risk before school program,Computer math club 1-3, and 4-6. FOCUS AREA 3: Science STATEMENT OF NEED: The 2001- 2002 science scores for 4-6 are increasing. However wishing to continue this trend we will be implementing projects and training to continue to raise the scores. MEASURABLE OBJECTIVES: We will use Spring 2003 CRT science results to establish base line data for the school year for grades 4-6. We will also use SAT 2003 science scores to establish base line data for grades 4- 6. PLANNED ACTIONS FOR PROFESSIONAL LEARNING: Core Academy K-6 Techology Training We will provide hands on training through the Science Integrated Curriculum. Teachers will begin exploring and implementing the program into the new state standards. PLANNED ACTIONS FOR PROJECTS: none
11. How does this plan relate to the school improvement/strategic plan?
See Plan Description in section 10.
12. FINANCIAL PROPOSAL
| Funds available: | |||
| 12748 | ||
| $6445 | ||
|
TOTAL | $19193 | ||
| How will the requested funds be spent? | |||
| $0 | ||
| $260 | ||
| $12749 | ||
| $0 | ||
| $800 | ||
|
| $13809 | ||
|
Remaining funds
(Total funds available minus planned expenditures) |
5384 | ||
13. If this plan utilizes additional funds, please specify amount
and source(s) of additional matching funds.
| Amount: | $0 | |
| Source(s): | ||
PUBLICIZING THE PLAN
14. How will the plan and results be publicized to your community? (Please check all that apply)
|
|
Report Approved: |
yes |
|
Reviewer: |
pmp for Granite |
2. Evaluation School's identified most critical academic need approved by the local school board:
3. Briefly report how the school implemented the school plan and how the School LAND Trust money is being spent.
FOCUS AREA 1: Literacy STATEMENT OF NEED: Whittier did not make Adequate Yearly Progress in Language Arts as a whole school or with students with disabilities. CRT scores for 2001-2002 show a decrease in grades 3, 5, and 6. SAT scores show an increase in 3rd grade from 2002 (37%)on complete battery to 2003 (39%) on complete battery. We need to continue support of all grades, continuing to establish programs, in service and projects. OUTCOME OF OBJECTIVES: Current data is not available to adequately determine if 2004 objectives have been met in the following areas: Whittier staff continued to focus on at-risk students (below minimum mastery) and showed a 2% increase. ACTIONS COMPLETED FOR PROFESSIONAL LEARNING: AR training Guided reading mini workshops with reading specialist. Six traits training for Kindergarten through 6th grade. 33 of 34 faculty members attended Summer Core Academy through Utah State University. ACTIONS COMPLETED FOR PROJECTS: School wide implementation of AR. Summer AR with a special invitation to the at-risk population. Summer boost: Kindergarten at-risk before school program. Developmental Reading Assessment Subs for 1st and 2nd grade. Tutoring for ELL students Grade Level Collaboration Meetings FUNDING EXPENDITURES: AR quizzes, maintenance, AR paper for testing, and toner purchased. Purchased guided reading materials. FOCUS AREA 2: Mathematics STATEMENT OF NEED: Whittier achieved Adequate Yearly Progress for the year 2002-2003. Whittier has seen an increase on test scores in mathematics, but achievement on Math Facts could be improved. OUTCOME OF OBJECTIVES: Current data is not available to adequately determine if 2004 objectives have been met. Whittier staff will decrease the achievement gap between ELL and non ELL population by 2% on the State Criterion Referenced Tests. Kindergarten projects will increase addition, number identification, one-to-one correspondence of numbers and simple subtraction of at-risk Kindergarten students achieving below grade level norms) by 5%. ACTIONS COMPLETED FOR PROFESSIONAL LEARNING: Teachers participated in the following professional learning activities: They worked with the District Math Specialists. All teachers attended the summer Core Academy focusing on mathematics in the classroom. CRT test interpretation, which allowed teachers to identify their strengths and areas for improvement in Mathematics. ACTIONS COMPLETED FOR PROJECTS: At risk students attended a summer boost program to prepare them for the new school year. At risk kindergarten students attended a math/ AR program to increase number sense. Whittier worked with Math Specialists from the district. Whittier had an after school tutoring for our homeless students. We had grade specific math lessons developed based on core standards from the Summer Core Academy. Whittier also had grade level collaboration meetings. FUNDING EXPENDITURES: Math workshop registration fee for teachers. FOCUS AREA 3: Science STATEMENT OF NEED: While our school has shown an increase on test data in science, it is still an area in which achievement can be improved. OUTCOME OF OBJECTIVES: Whittier will use Spring 2003 CRT science results to establish base line data for the school year for grades 4-6. We will also use SAT 2003 science scores to establish base line data for grades 4- 6. ACTIONS COMPLETED FOR PROFESSIONAL LEARNING: Teachers in grades K-6 attended summer Core Academy. Whittier provided hands on training through the Science Integrated Curriculum. Teachers will begin exploring and implementing the program into the new state standards. ACTIONS COMPLETED FOR PROJECTS: Due to this past year being a baseline year in science we did not have any teachers completing projects. Whittier did have grade level collaboration meetings and development of grade specific science lessons from the Core Academy. FUNDING EXPENDITURES: We purchased expository texts for guided reading library in grades kindergarten through 6th. Provided A-Z literacy site that contained many expository texts for grades K-6. 4. Financial Report
5. How did the committee publicize the school plan as required by law? Three teachers that attended the caucus meeting became delegates. Our school was highlighted in the Tribune on February 2, 2004 for Bachauer Foundation Assembly. Monthly Newsletter sent home with students Share School Student Achievement Plan and Trust Land Plan at School Community Council 6. Letters about the impact of your program on students are crucial for continued funding to your school. Please mark and select the names of the individuals to whom you sent letters. Addresses are available under Resources for Your Committee
| |||