|
School LAND Trust Program
| Person responsible for implementing the plan: |
| Name: | Steve Taylor |
District: | North Summit |
| Email: | Steven.Taylor@granite.k12.ut.us |
School: | Central Davis JR |
| Position: | principal |
| |
Academic Plan Proposal and Report for 2005-2006
1. During the 2005-2006 school year, the School Community Council met:
2. Did the committee view the video "Using the Trust?"
3. Duration of the plan:
4. School's most critical academic need(s):
| Identified in the plan |
Indentified by the report |
|
|
|
5. Plan description
In reading and math, one of the actions that supports accomplishment of our
goals is to improve teacher effectiveness. This year we plan to accomplish
this by providing our teachers with the instructional tools they require.
We plan to purchase a new reading program, classroom leveled libraries, and
math manipulatives. We also will offer professional development in support
of both areas of concern.
|
6. Report description
- Explanation of implementation and progress
This year's plan implementation has involved professional development in
the area of differentiation. We have continued to place emphasis on
integrated curriculum and are supporting teacher use of our new basal
reading program. We spent $15,000 on classroom leveled libraries and have
added titles to our building library and supported the efforts of teachers
using Accelerated Reader.
|
- Measurement of student improvement
Whittier achieved adequate yearly progress. Students in grades 3-6 have
shown steady progress in math, demonstrating proficiency on the Mathematics
CRT with scores increasing from 48% to 52% to 56% to 60% in 2005. We are
using a Granite School District quarterly test of math achievement to
provide more frequent tracking of student progress in grades 1-6. A steady
decline in Language Arts CRTs was reversed as scores went from 63% to 59%
to 56% and back to 63% in 2005. Students with disabilities have not shown
growth during this period of time and is the subgroup greatest in need of
additional attention. We are establishing a baseline for student
performance on the Granite School District Quarterly Math Assessment.
Currently 71% of students in grades 1-6 have scored 75% or better. We are
establishing a baseline for student performance on the DIBELS in oral
reading fluency. Currently 51% of students in grades 1-6 have scored at or
above baseline.
|
- Impact of funds on students
Without Trust Land funds, there is not the money available to provide the
instructional tools and professional development that teachers need to be
most effective.
|
7. Financial proposal and report
| Available funds |
Plan (estimates) | Report (actual) |
|
Distribution for 2005-2006 |
$15447 | $26565 |
| | Carry-over from 2004-2005 |
$24143 | $2 |
| | Total available for expenditure | $39590 | $26567 |
| Expenditures |
| |
| | Salaries and Employee Benefits |
$0 | $3815 |
| | Professional Development/Technical Services |
$2500 | $0 |
| | Repairs and Maintenance |
$0 | $0 |
| | Travel / Admissions / Printing |
$0 | $0 |
| | General Supplies |
$0 | $0 |
| |
Textbooks |
$26000 | $0 |
| | Library Books/Periodicals/Audiovisual |
$0 |
$0 |
| | Technology/Software/Equipment |
$0 | $22376 |
| | Total Expenditures | $28500 | $26191 |
| | Remaining Funds |
$2342 | $376 |
The unused balance to be carried over to next school year is more than half of the funds received, please explain why.
We expect to purchase additional leveled readers for classroom libraries
prior to the end of this school year.
8. Were a substantial portion of funds spent for remediation?
9. How the plan related to the School Improvement Plan
|
This plan supports our School Student Improvement Plan directly.
|
10. Additional funds that have been identified to implement the plan
11. The council sent letters explaining the school plan to:
- Governor Jon Huntsman Jr.
- Utah Sen. Dist. 12 - Brent Goodfellow
- Utah Rep. Dist. 32 - Ron Bigelow
- Local School Board - Henry Hank Bertoch
|
12. The school plan was advertised to the community in the following ways:
- Letters to state senators, representatives, governor, and congressional delegation
- School newsletter
|
13. How your committee will further its goals if the school recieves more money than estimated in
the financial proposal of this School Plan?
We will use additional funds to expand our efforts in improving instruction
through the purchase of teacher tools and providing professional
development. We are also seeking opportunities to provide students better
access to quality literature through expanding our building and classroom
libraries.
Academic Plan Proposal for 2006-2007
1. Did the committee view the video "Using the Trust?"
2. Duration of the plan:
3. School's most critical academic need(s):
4. Plan description
- How the money will be spent to improve academic performace
We will continue to use trust land funds to provide teachers with the
instructional tools they require. We plan to add to classroom leveled
libraries, increase the number of books in our building library, and set aside funds to purchase math manipulatives. We will offer professional development in differentiation, use of math manipulatives, and instructional interventions
for students having difficulty with the reading process.
|
- Goals for student improvement
Students will demonstrate mastery of Utah Core Curriculum in language arts
by showing growth in the number of students reaching grade level reading
skills in fluency, phonemic awareness, and phonics by 5% as measured by
those reaching DIBELS benchmarks. Students will demonstrate mastery of
Utah Core Curriculum in math by showing growth on quarterly math
assessments
and reaching a score of at least 70% on each post test. They will also
demonstrate mastery of basic math computation facts.
|
- How improvement is assessed or measured
We will measure academic improvement through use of the CRT, Granite
District Quarterly Math Assessment, and DIBELS. We also intend to develop
an efficient method for tracking the independent reading of our students
and plan to measure student mastery of math facts.
|
- How the school will further the goals if there is more money than estimated
|
We will use additional funds to expand our efforts in improving instruction
through the purchase of teacher tools and providing professional
development. We are also seeking opportunities to provide students better
access to quality literature through expanding our building and classroom
libraries.
|
5. How the plan relates to the School Improvement Plan
This plan supports the instructional efforts of our teachers to more
adequately provide students the skills they need to be successful in
reading and math.
|
6. Financial proposal
| Available funds |
Plan Estimates |
| |
School LAND Trust funds for 2006-2007 | $21773 |
| |
Carry-over from 2005-2006 |
$19590 |
| |
Total available for expenditure |
$41363 |
| Expenditures |
|
| | Professional Development |
$1000 |
| | Computers / Microscopes / Calculators / Repairs / Maintenance |
$0 |
| | Textbooks / Books / Media / Software / Supplies |
$15000 |
| | Library / Media |
$3000 |
| | Supplies / Materials / Equipment |
$20000 |
| | Travel / Admissions / Printing |
$0 |
| | Salaries / Benefits |
$0 | | | Total Expenditures |
$39000 |
| | Remaining Funds |
$2363 | | Why more than half of available funds were not spent |
|
We expect to purchase additional leveled readers for classroom libraries
prior to the end of this school year.
|
7. Additional funds that have been identified to implement the plan
8. The school plan will be advertised to the community in the following ways:
- Letters to state senators, representatives, governor, and congressional delegation
School newsletter
| |
|