School LAND Trust Program - Learning and Nurturing Development with Trustland Dividends Logged in as:
Fremont EL (Duchesne District)

Logout


Return to Home Page

Submit or Edit
Plans & Councils
View Plans
& Councils
Funding Plan Approval Dates General
Information
Help

School LAND Trust Program

Person responsible for implementing the plan:
Name:Steve Taylor District: Duchesne
Email:Steven.Taylor@granite.k12.ut.us School: Fremont EL
Position:principal
 

Academic Plan Proposal and Report for 2005-2006

1. During the 2005-2006 school year, the School Community Council met:
More Than 6 Times

2. Did the committee view the video "Using the Trust?"
No

3. Duration of the plan:
Single Year

4. School's most critical academic need(s):
Identified in the plan Indentified by the report
  • Reading
  • Mathematics
  • Reading
  • Mathematics

5. Plan description
In reading and math, one of the actions that supports accomplishment of our
goals is to improve teacher effectiveness. This year we plan to accomplish
this by providing our teachers with the instructional tools they require.
We plan to purchase a new reading program, classroom leveled libraries, and
math manipulatives. We also will offer professional development in support
of both areas of concern.

6. Report description

  • Explanation of implementation and progress
    This year's plan implementation has involved professional development in
    the area of differentiation. We have continued to place emphasis on
    integrated curriculum and are supporting teacher use of our new basal
    reading program. We spent $15,000 on classroom leveled libraries and have
    added titles to our building library and supported the efforts of teachers
    using Accelerated Reader.
  • Measurement of student improvement
    Whittier achieved adequate yearly progress. Students in grades 3-6 have
    shown steady progress in math, demonstrating proficiency on the Mathematics
    CRT with scores increasing from 48% to 52% to 56% to 60% in 2005. We are
    using a Granite School District quarterly test of math achievement to
    provide more frequent tracking of student progress in grades 1-6. A steady
    decline in Language Arts CRTs was reversed as scores went from 63% to 59%
    to 56% and back to 63% in 2005. Students with disabilities have not shown
    growth during this period of time and is the subgroup greatest in need of
    additional attention. We are establishing a baseline for student
    performance on the Granite School District Quarterly Math Assessment.
    Currently 71% of students in grades 1-6 have scored 75% or better. We are
    establishing a baseline for student performance on the DIBELS in oral
    reading fluency. Currently 51% of students in grades 1-6 have scored at or
    above baseline.
  • Impact of funds on students
    Without Trust Land funds, there is not the money available to provide the
    instructional tools and professional development that teachers need to be
    most effective.

7. Financial proposal and report
Available funds Plan (estimates)Report (actual)
  Distribution for 2005-2006 $15447$10221
 Carry-over from 2004-2005 $24143$5194
 Total available for expenditure$39590$15415
Expenditures   
 Salaries and Employee Benefits $0$843
 Professional Development/Technical Services $2500$0
 Repairs and Maintenance $0$0
 Travel / Admissions / Printing $0$0
 General Supplies $0$7330
  Textbooks $26000$0
 Library Books/Periodicals/Audiovisual $0 $0
 Technology/Software/Equipment $0$4760
 Total Expenditures$28500$12933
 Remaining Funds $2342$2482

The unused balance to be carried over to next school year is more than half of the funds received, please explain why.

We expect to purchase additional leveled readers for classroom libraries prior to the end of this school year.

8. Were a substantial portion of funds spent for remediation?
No

9. How the plan related to the School Improvement Plan
This plan supports our School Student Improvement Plan directly.

10. Additional funds that have been identified to implement the plan
Amount:  $0
Source:  none

11. The council sent letters explaining the school plan to:
  • Governor Jon Huntsman Jr.
  • Utah Sen. Dist. 12 - Brent Goodfellow
  • Utah Rep. Dist. 32 - Ron Bigelow
  • Local School Board - Henry Hank Bertoch

12. The school plan was advertised to the community in the following ways:
  • Letters to state senators, representatives, governor, and congressional delegation
  • School newsletter

13. How your committee will further its goals if the school recieves more money than estimated in the financial proposal of this School Plan?
We will use additional funds to expand our efforts in improving instruction through the purchase of teacher tools and providing professional development. We are also seeking opportunities to provide students better access to quality literature through expanding our building and classroom libraries.

Academic Plan Proposal for 2006-2007

1. Did the committee view the video "Using the Trust?"
Yes

2. Duration of the plan:
Single Year

3. School's most critical academic need(s):
  • Reading
  • Mathematics

4. Plan description

  • How the money will be spent to improve academic performace
    We will continue to use trust land funds to provide teachers with the
    instructional tools they require. We plan to add to classroom leveled
    libraries, increase the number of books in our building library, and set
    aside funds to purchase math manipulatives. We will offer professional
    development in differentiation, use of math manipulatives, and instructional
    interventions
    for students having difficulty with the reading process.
  • Goals for student improvement
    Students will demonstrate mastery of Utah Core Curriculum in language arts
    by showing growth in the number of students reaching grade level reading
    skills in fluency, phonemic awareness, and phonics by 5% as measured by
    those reaching DIBELS benchmarks. Students will demonstrate mastery of
    Utah Core Curriculum in math by showing growth on quarterly math
    assessments
    and reaching a score of at least 70% on each post test. They will also
    demonstrate mastery of basic math computation facts.
  • How improvement is assessed or measured
    We will measure academic improvement through use of the CRT, Granite
    District Quarterly Math Assessment, and DIBELS. We also intend to develop
    an efficient method for tracking the independent reading of our students
    and plan to measure student mastery of math facts.
  • How the school will further the goals if there is more money than estimated
    We will use additional funds to expand our efforts in improving instruction through the purchase of teacher tools and providing professional development. We are also seeking opportunities to provide students better access to quality literature through expanding our building and classroom libraries.

5. How the plan relates to the School Improvement Plan
This plan supports the instructional efforts of our teachers to more
adequately provide students the skills they need to be successful in
reading and math.

6. Financial proposal
Available funds Plan Estimates
  School LAND Trust funds for 2006-2007$21773
  Carry-over from 2005-2006 $19590
  Total available for expenditure $41363
Expenditures  
 Professional Development $1000
 Computers / Microscopes / Calculators / Repairs / Maintenance $0
 Textbooks / Books / Media / Software / Supplies $15000
 Library / Media $3000
 Supplies / Materials / Equipment $20000
 Travel / Admissions / Printing $0
 Salaries / Benefits $0
 Total Expenditures $39000
 Remaining Funds $2363
Why more than half of available funds were not spent
We expect to purchase additional leveled readers for classroom libraries
prior to the end of this school year.

7. Additional funds that have been identified to implement the plan
Amount:  $0
Source:  none

8. The school plan will be advertised to the community in the following ways:
  • Letters to state senators, representatives, governor, and congressional delegationSchool newsletter