| 1. |
During the 2006-2007 school year, the School Community Council or Trust Lands (for Charter Schools) met: |
| |
7-9 times |
| 2. |
School's identified most cristical academic need(s) addressed in the plan: |
| |
| Academic areas as identified in the plan |
Academic areas as implemented in the plan |
Reading
Mathematics
|
Reading
Mathematics
|
|
| 3. |
Financial proposal and report: |
| |
| Available Funds |
Planned Expenditures (entered by the school) |
Actual Expenditures (entered by the district) |
| Distribution for 2006 - 2007 |
$21773 |
$25746 |
| Carry-over from 2005 - 2006 |
$24146 |
$22650 |
| Total Available for expenditure in 2006 - 2007 |
$45919 |
$48396 |
| Salaries and Employee Benefits (100 and 200) |
$0 |
$1356 |
| Professional Development and Technical Services (300) |
$1000 |
$489 |
| Repairs and Maintenance (430) |
$0 |
$0 |
| Other Purchased Services (Travel / Admission / Printing) (500) |
$0 |
$0 |
| General Supplies (610, 630 and 733) |
$20000 |
$0 |
| Textbooks (641) |
$15000 |
$21444 |
| Library Books / Periodicals / Audiovisual (644, 645, 646) |
$3000 |
$0 |
| Software / Technology related Hardware / Other Equipment (670, 734, 739) |
$0 |
$0 |
| Total Expenditures |
$39000 |
$23289 |
| Remaining Funds (Carry-over to 2008 - ) |
$6919 |
$25107 |
|
| 3. a |
Description of expenditures in Other Purchased Services (Travel / Admission / Printing). |
| |
This question is not applicable. |
| 3. b |
Description of expenditures in General Supplies. |
| | This question is not applicable. |
| 3. c |
Explanation for the carry over to 2007-2008, if it was more than half of the available funds. |
| | This question is not applicable. |
| 4. |
This is what the School Community Council or Trust Lands Committee planned to do and how they planned for the money to be spent. |
| | We will continue to use trust land funds to provide teachers with
the
instructional tools they require. We plan to add to classroom
leveled
libraries, increase the number of books in our building library, and
set aside funds to purchase math manipulatives. We will offer
professional development in differentiation, use of math manipulatives, and
instructional interventions
for students having difficulty with the
reading process. |
| 4. a |
This is a report of what the school did and how the funds were spent to improve student academic performance. |
| | We spent Trust Land Funds on purchasing leveled libraries for each grade level,
and increased the number of books in the school media center. We also purchased
some of the needed math manipulatives. Teachers have also attended professional
development sessions on differentiated learning, instructional interventions in
the reading process for struggling students, and use of math manipulatives. |
| 5. |
These are the committee's specific goals for student improvement entered in the plan. |
| | Students will demonstrate mastery of Utah Core Curriculum in language
arts
by showing growth in the number of students reaching grade level
reading
skills in fluency, phonemic awareness, and phonics by 5% as measured
by
those reaching DIBELS benchmarks. Students will demonstrate mastery
of
Utah Core Curriculum in math by showing growth on quarterly
math
assessments
and reaching a score of at least 70% on each post test.
They will also
demonstrate mastery of basic math computation facts. |
| 5. a |
This is a report of how the goals were achieved. |
| | While our students continued to show improvement in the language arts part of
the Utah CORE Curriculum, we did not achieve the goal of an increase of 5% of
students reaching DIBELS benchmarks. In the math area, students demonstrated
mastery of basic computation through performance on classroom assessments, they
also increased in the number of students reaching 70% mastery on quarterly
benchmarks. |
| 6. |
This is how the committee planned to measure/assess academic improvement. |
| | We will measure academic improvement through use of the CRT,
Granite
District Quarterly Math Assessment, and DIBELS. We also intend to
develop
an efficient method for tracking the independent reading of our
students
and plan to measure student mastery of math facts. |
| 6. a |
This is a report on how academic improvement was measured/assessed. |
| | Academic improvement was measured by comparing scores on previous CRT and
Quarterly Math Assessments with scores from this current year. Also the DIBELS
history of benchmark scores was compared for each student to determine the
number reaching benchmarks. |
| 7. |
In the school plan, there was an opportunity to explain how additional funds exceeding the estimated distribution would be spent. The following is what was reported. |
| | We will use additional funds to expand our efforts in improving instruction
through the purchase of teacher tools and providing professional
development. We are also seeking opportunities to provide students better
access to quality literature through expanding our building and classroom
libraries. |
| 7. a |
This is a description of how the additional funds were spent. |
| | Additional funds were spent to provide professional development in
differentiation of instruction. Also funds were spent to provide aides to
teachers needing help with lower achieving students. |
| 8. |
This is how the plan relates to the School Improvement Plan. |
| |
This plan supports the instructional efforts of our teachers to more
adequately provide students the skills they need to be successful in
reading and math. |
| 9. |
The amount and source of additional funds, matching or grants, used to implement the plan. |
| |
Amount: $0
Source:
|
| 10. |
The school plan was advertised to the community in the following ways: |
| |
Letters to State Senators, Representatives, Govenor, Attorney General, State Treasurer, and Congressional Delegation
School newsletter
|
| 11. |
Policy makers with whom the school has communicated about the program. (This is not required) |
| |
- Dist. 32 -- Ron Bigelow
- Dist. 29 -- Janice M. Fisher
- Dist. 12 -- Brent Goodfellow
|
| 1. |
Have you shown the video Using the Trust to the Council? |
| |
yes |
| 2. |
Duration of the plan: (Plan proposal must be submitted each year) |
| |
Single Year |
| 3. |
School's identified most critical need(s) addressed in this plan: Please check only the primary area(s). Improvement in some academic areas may improve all other academic areas but if the goal is to improve reading (or technology), only check that area. |
| |
• Reading • Mathematics
|
| 4. |
Briefly describe the school plan. |
| |
|
| 4. a |
What you will do and how the money will be spent to improve student academic performance (be specific). |
| |
We will continue to use trust land funds to provide teachers with the instructional tools they require.
..We will purchase a new mathematics program or supplemental math materials to assist in implementing the district and state math curriculum.
..We will purchase materials for classroom and school leveled libraries to support teacher efforts in differentiating instruction.
We will hire 4-5 aides to provide student tutoring support in reading. We will provide professional development in reading, focusing on small group instruction and collaboration between our reading specialist, resource teachers, aides, and classroom teachers. |
| 4. b |
Your committee's specific goals for student improvement. |
| |
Students will demonstrate mastery of Utah Core Curriculum in language arts by showing growth in the number of students reaching grade level reading skills in fluency, phonemic awareness, and phonics by 5% as measured by those reaching DIBELS benchmarks in each of the tested areas.
Students will demonstrate mastery of Utah Core Curriculum in math by showing growth on quarterly math assessments, reaching a score of at least 70% on each post test. They will also demonstrate mastery of basic math computation facts, developing fluency with multiplication/division facts by the end of fourth grade and addition/subtraction facts by the end of second grade. |
| 4. c |
How your committee will measure or assess academic improvement. |
| |
We will measure academic improvement through use of the CRT, Granite District Quarterly Math Assessment, DIBELS, informal assessment of math facts mastery, math computation skills, and reading skills. We are also capturing data on independent reading outside of school to measure the amount of practice they devote to their reading skills and the extent to which we are encouraging and developing reading enjoyment. |
| 4. d |
How your committee intends to spend additional funds for academic improvement if the school receives more money than estimated in the financial proposal of this school plan. |
| |
Should additional funds be available we will add to our efforts to provide additional instructional support through the use of aides. We are also seeking opportunities to provide students better access to quality literature through expanding our building and classroom libraries. |
| 5. |
How does this plan relate to the school improvement/strategic plan? |
| |
Our Trust Lands plan supports our school improvement plan directly. Trust Lands funds support teacher instructional efforts to intervene on behalf of students who are not experiencing success by providing materials, professional development and aide assistance. We are using the same assessment methods and tools. Goals are the same, target populations are the same, and areas of concern are the same. The primary focus of our school improvement plan is teacher directed interventions that provide additional instructional contact with those students who are not making adequate yearly progress as measured by state testing, district testing, and school and teacher informal assessment. |
| 6 |
Financial Report:
| Carry in from 2006 - 2007 |
$0 |
| ESTIMATED Distributed To School 2007 - 2008 |
$27504 |
| ESTIMATED Total Available Funds 2007 - 2008 |
$27,504 |
| Salaries and Employee Benefits |
$35,000 |
| Professional Development/Technical Services |
$3000 |
| Repairs and Maintenance |
$0 |
| Travel / Admissions / Printing |
$0 |
| General Supplies |
$500 |
| Textbooks |
$10,000 |
| Library Books / Periodicals / Audiovisual |
$2000 |
| Technology / Software / Equipment |
$0 |
| ESTIMATED Total Spent 2007 - 2008 |
$50,500 |
ESTIMATED Carry over 2008 - 2009 |
$-22,996 |
|
| 6. a |
Please explain any planned expenditure in General Supplies |
| |
General supplies will provide support to teacher intervention projects using instructional materials and student reinforcers. |
| 6. b |
If you plan to Carry Over more than half your distribution, please explain below.
|
| |
|
| 7. a |
If this plan utilizes additional funds, please specify amount and source(s) of additional matching funds. Amount: |
| |
|
| 7. b |
Source(s) |
| |
|
| 8. a |
How will the plan and results be publicized to your community?(Please check all that apply) |
| |
• School newsletter • Letters to State Senators, Representatives, Govenor, Attorney General, State Treasurer, and Congressional Delegation
|
| 8. b |
Other. Please Explain. |
| |
|
| 9. |
In order for schools to receive School LAND Trust Program funds, councils must follow the law. You may view the School Community Council Law by Clicking Here and the School LAND Trust Program Law by Clicking Here. To assure that the law has been followed, answer the following questions by clicking yes or no. All |
| |
|
| 9. a |
Notification was provided two weeks in advance of elections for the School Community Council |
| |
yes |
| 9. b |
Parents were elected by parents or when there were unfilled positions, the parent members on the council appointed parent members to fill the positions. |
| |
yes |
| 9. c |
Employees were elected by employees or when there were unfilled positions, the employee members on the council appointed employee members to fill the positions. |
| |
yes |
| 9. d |
Proper notice of meetings was provided to the public by posting on the school door beginning the day before the meeting or annual notice was given at the beginning of the school year for regularly scheduled meetings. |
| |
yes |
| 9. e |
Explain any 'No' answers |
| |
|