|
School LAND Trust Program
| Person responsible for implementing the plan: |
| Name: | Lee Gagon |
District: | Tintic |
| Email: | lee.gagon@uintah.net |
School: | South Davis JR |
| Position: | principal |
| |
2006-2007 SCHOOL PLAN AND REPORT
| 1. |
During the 2006-2007 school year, the School Community Council or Trust Lands (for Charter Schools) met: |
| |
4-6 times |
| 2. |
School's identified most cristical academic need(s) addressed in the plan: |
| |
| Academic areas as identified in the plan |
Academic areas as implemented in the plan |
Reading
Writing
|
Reading
Mathematics
Science
|
|
| 3. |
Financial proposal and report: |
| |
| Available Funds |
Planned Expenditures (entered by the school) |
Actual Expenditures (entered by the district) |
| Distribution for 2006 - 2007 |
$9803 |
$32456 |
| Carry-over from 2005 - 2006 |
$800 |
$0 |
| Total Available for expenditure in 2006 - 2007 |
$10603 |
$32456 |
| Salaries and Employee Benefits (100 and 200) |
$0 |
$31910 |
| Professional Development and Technical Services (300) |
$0 |
$0 |
| Repairs and Maintenance (430) |
$0 |
$0 |
| Other Purchased Services (Travel / Admission / Printing) (500) |
$0 |
$0 |
| General Supplies (610, 630 and 733) |
$2000 |
$0 |
| Textbooks (641) |
$7803 |
$0 |
| Library Books / Periodicals / Audiovisual (644, 645, 646) |
$0 |
$0 |
| Software / Technology related Hardware / Other Equipment (670, 734, 739) |
$0 |
$0 |
| Total Expenditures |
$9803 |
$31910 |
| Remaining Funds (Carry-over to 2008 - ) |
$800 |
$546 |
|
| 3. a |
Description of expenditures in Other Purchased Services (Travel / Admission / Printing). |
| |
This question is not applicable. |
| 3. b |
Description of expenditures in General Supplies. |
| | This question is not applicable. |
| 3. c |
Explanation for the carry over to 2007-2008, if it was more than half of the available funds. |
| | This question is not applicable. |
| 4. |
This is what the School Community Council or Trust Lands Committee planned to do and how they planned for the money to be spent. |
| | Naples School Land Trust Committee members again agreed that, in order
to
use the upcoming School Land Trust funds to best support our ongoing
goal
of
improving students' reading/language arts skills, we will
purchase leveled
books and other language arts materials for classrooms and
for our leveled
library. |
| 4. a |
This is a report of what the school did and how the funds were spent to improve student academic performance. |
| | Our Trust Land funds were used to support our computer/writing/ Plato lab. Along
with additional funds, Trust Lands provided the salary for our lab supervisor
who schedules the lab for our teachers, trouble shoots, assists in training
teachers and students on various software and programs, and helps with
after-school remediation programs. Without her supervision, the lab would be
available only on a limited basis and the after-school remediation would not
exist. Our remediation program assists over 40 students each term in achieving
acceptable learning in math, science, language arts and social studies. |
| 5. |
These are the committee's specific goals for student improvement entered in the plan. |
| | Our goal is for every student to experience at least one year's
academic
growth during the 2006-2007 school year. |
| 5. a |
This is a report of how the goals were achieved. |
| | With respect to our goal of having all (the template that is used for this
report only allows us to report our goals as though we had one for science, one
for math and one for reading) of our CRT scores be above the district average.
Areas of concern are language arts 7 and 9 and science 7. Our language arts 7
score was the only score below the district average, but language arts 9 and
science 7 are not as far above the district average as previous years. Language
arts 8, science 8 and science 9 were below last year but are above for the
'06-'07 school year.Although individual teachers achieved the 80/80 goal (Again,
this goal pertains to math, science and language arts) with certain groups of
students, no entire course (math 7, for example) achieved it. However, CRT level
4 mastery scores for math, science and language arts show general improvement
over a four year period. We are working to assure that all of our students read
and write at grade level. Currently, about 20% school wide read below grade
level, based on the STAR reading test. For both reading and writing, our CRT
scores have improved steadily over the last five years or are higher in 2007
than in 2003, except 7th and 9th grade writing. However, 9th grade writing in
2007 was still above the district average. This is year began testing all
students in reading and writing, while in the past we have only tested students
in SOAR, Spartan Academy and special education. Of those students, in SOAR,
Spartan Academy and special education, 67% last year improved at least one grade
level during the year. |
| 6. |
This is how the committee planned to measure/assess academic improvement. |
| | Academic improvement will be measured or assessed using a variety
of
measures, including - but not limited to - informal reading
inventories,
running records, DIBELS, NWEA, and State CORE assessments. |
| 6. a |
This is a report on how academic improvement was measured/assessed. |
| | All CRT scores are above the district average except those noted below.Language
arts 7, 2.6 percentage points below the district. As noted above, this is an
improvement over last year in which 3 courses were below.Language 8, Science 8,
and Science 9 scores improved while all others remained about the
same.Sixty-seven percent of our students identified as reading and writing below
grade level raised their grade level scores. |
| 7. |
In the school plan, there was an opportunity to explain how additional funds exceeding the estimated distribution would be spent. The following is what was reported. |
| | Any additional funds will be spent to purchase additional books and
materials to support teaching and learning in the area of reading/language
arts, as described above. |
| 7. a |
This is a description of how the additional funds were spent. |
| | Additional funds were used to provide training and materials for teachers in
teaching reading and writing. Additionally, teachers received ongoing training
regarding classroom management and strategies for improving learning. To
paraphrase Steven R. Covey, school improvement is really people improvement. Our
school improvement plan focused on improving how we do our jobs; how we get kids
to learn. Therefore, additional training provided us with the tools to do our
jobs better. |
| 8. |
This is how the plan relates to the School Improvement Plan. |
| |
This plan relates directly to, and strongly supports, the Naples School
Improvement Plan by allowing for the purchase of materials and supplies to
enhance teaching and learning - and thereby student academic growth - in
the area of reading/language arts. |
| 9. |
The amount and source of additional funds, matching or grants, used to implement the plan. |
| |
Amount: $0
Source:
|
| 10. |
The school plan was advertised to the community in the following ways: |
| |
School newsletter
Letters to State Senators, Representatives, Govenor, Attorney General, State Treasurer, and Congressional Delegation
|
| 11. |
Policy makers with whom the school has communicated about the program. (This is not required) |
| |
- Barbara Smith
- Kim R. Burningham
- Dist. 19 -- Sheryl L. Allen
- Dist. 23 -- Dan R. Eastman
- Chris Cannon
- Jim Matheson
- Rob Bishop
- Bob Bennett
- Orrin Hatch
- Governor: Jon Huntsman Jr.
|
Academic Plan 2007-2008
| 1. |
Have you shown the video Using the Trust to the Council? |
| |
yes |
| 2. |
Duration of the plan: (Plan proposal must be submitted each year) |
| |
Single Year |
| 3. |
School's identified most critical need(s) addressed in this plan: Please check only the primary area(s). Improvement in some academic areas may improve all other academic areas but if the goal is to improve reading (or technology), only check that area. |
| |
• Science • Reading • Mathematics
|
| 4. |
Briefly describe the school plan. |
| |
|
| 4. a |
What you will do and how the money will be spent to improve student academic performance (be specific). |
| |
Our Trust Land funds are used to support our computer/writing/ Plato lab. Along with additional funds, Trust Lands provides the salary for our lab supervisor who schedules the lab for our teachers, trouble shoots, assists in training teachers and students on various software and programs, and helps with after-school remediation programs. Without her supervision, the lab would be available only on a limited basis and the after-school remediation would not exist. Our remediation program assists over 40 students each term in achieving acceptable learning in math, science, language arts and social studies. Our writing labs provide students with opportunities for research, application and enrichment. They are rarely unscheduled. |
| 4. b |
Your committee's specific goals for student improvement. |
| |
Mathematics: Eighty percent of our students will master 80% of the curriculum. Science: End-of-level CRT scores will be at or above the district average. Reading: All students will read and write at or above grade level by the time they leave South Davis |
| 4. c |
How your committee will measure or assess academic improvement. |
| |
Iowa Test of Basic Skills (ITBS), 1-3 Stanford Diagnostic Reading Test (SDRT), State Criterion Referenced Tests (CRTs), Direct Writing Assessment. |
| 4. d |
How your committee intends to spend additional funds for academic improvement if the school receives more money than estimated in the financial proposal of this school plan. |
| |
Additional funds will be used to provide training and materials for teachers in teaching reading and writing. Additionally, teachers will receive ongoing training regarding classroom management and strategies for improving learning. To paraphrase Steven R. Covey, |
| 5. |
How does this plan relate to the school improvement/strategic plan? |
| |
The Trust Lands Plan and School Improvement Plan are created together as one plan. Trust Lands is part of the School Improvement Plan. |
| 6 |
Financial Report:
| Carry in from 2006 - 2007 |
$0 |
| ESTIMATED Distributed To School 2007 - 2008 |
$35900 |
| ESTIMATED Total Available Funds 2007 - 2008 |
$35,900 |
| Salaries and Employee Benefits |
$27,000 |
| Professional Development/Technical Services |
$0 |
| Repairs and Maintenance |
$0 |
| Travel / Admissions / Printing |
$0 |
| General Supplies |
$0 |
| Textbooks |
$0 |
| Library Books / Periodicals / Audiovisual |
$0 |
| Technology / Software / Equipment |
$8900 |
| ESTIMATED Total Spent 2007 - 2008 |
$35,900 |
ESTIMATED Carry over 2008 - 2009 |
$0 |
|
| 6. a |
Please explain any planned expenditure in General Supplies |
| |
Not applicable |
| 6. b |
If you plan to Carry Over more than half your distribution, please explain below.
|
| |
Not applicable |
| 7. a |
If this plan utilizes additional funds, please specify amount and source(s) of additional matching funds. Amount: |
| |
29,240 |
| 7. b |
Source(s) |
| |
School store $24,000TAP funds $15,240.00 |
| 8. a |
How will the plan and results be publicized to your community?(Please check all that apply) |
| |
• Letters to State Senators, Representatives, Govenor, Attorney General, State Treasurer, and Congressional Delegation
|
| 8. b |
Other. Please Explain. |
| |
|
| 9. |
In order for schools to receive School LAND Trust Program funds, councils must follow the law. You may view the School Community Council Law by Clicking Here and the School LAND Trust Program Law by Clicking Here. To assure that the law has been followed, answer the following questions by clicking yes or no. All |
| |
|
| 9. a |
Notification was provided two weeks in advance of elections for the School Community Council |
| |
no |
| 9. b |
Parents were elected by parents or when there were unfilled positions, the parent members on the council appointed parent members to fill the positions. |
| |
yes |
| 9. c |
Employees were elected by employees or when there were unfilled positions, the employee members on the council appointed employee members to fill the positions. |
| |
yes |
| 9. d |
Proper notice of meetings was provided to the public by posting on the school door beginning the day before the meeting or annual notice was given at the beginning of the school year for regularly scheduled meetings. |
| |
yes |
| 9. e |
Explain any 'No' answers |
| |
We plan to notify in May of this year for elections to be held in August 2007. |
|