School LAND Trust Program - Learning and Nurturing Development with Trustland Dividends Logged in as:
Whittier EL (Wayne District)

Logout


Return to Home Page

Submit or Edit
Plans & Councils
View Plans
& Councils
Funding Plan Approval Dates General
Information
Help

School LAND Trust Program

Name: Judy Giles District: Granite
Email: jgiles@graniteschools.org School: Whittier EL
Position: Principal  

Academic Plan Proposal and Report for 2007-2008

1. During the 2007-2008 school year the School Community Council or Trust Lands Committee (for charter schools) met:
  7-9 times
2. School's identified most critical academic need(s) addressed in the plan:
Please check only the primary area(s). Improvement in some academic areas may improve all other academic areas, but if the goal is to improve reading (or technology), please only check that area.
 
Academic areas as identified in the plan Academic areas as implemented in the plan
Mathematics
Reading
Mathematics
Reading
3. Financial proposal and report
 
Available Funds Planned Expenditures
(entered by the school)
Actual Expenditures
(entered by the District Business Administrator)
Distribution for 2007 - 2008 $27504 $33176
Carry-over from 2006 - 2007 $0 $25107
Total Available for expenditure in 2007-2008 $27504 $58283
Salaries and Employee Benefits (100 and 200) $35000 $46623
Professional Development and Technical Services (300) $3000 $10000
Repairs and Maintenance (430) $0 $0
Other Purchased Services (Travel / Admission / Printing) (500) $0 $0
General Supplies (610, 630 and 733) $500 $2263
Textbooks (641) $10000 $0
Library Books / Periodicals / Audiovisual (644, 645, 646) $2000 $0
Software / Technology related Hardware / Other Equipment (670, 734, 739) $0 $1000
Total Expenditures $50500 $59886
Remaining Funds (Carry-over to 2008 - 2009) $-22996 $-1603
3. a Description of expenditures in Other Purchased Services (Travel / Admission / Printing).
 
 
This text box is not applicable.
 
3. b Description of expenditures in General Supplies.
   
 
In order to support our school wide commitment to improve literacy, materials were
purchased specifically to support our Literacy Leadership training for reading in grades K
through First.  These materials included games and activities to assist in small group
instruction.  Supplies were also purchased to provide supplemental instructional materials
for parents to help their students in both literacy and math.  These home practice
materials were distributed to parents at our Literacy Night and our Numeracy Night.  The
materials were also distributed to parents at our SEP Conferences.  Math manipulatives
were also purchased for all grade levels to supplement hands on instruction of math
concepts.  As teachers on each grade level attended math training from our district's
math specialists, supplies were purchased for teachers to create materials for student use
in their classrooms. These supplies were used to help teachers differentiate classroom
instruction to meet individual student needs as determined by our stated assessment
tools.Other purchases included wall card charts for all first grades and kindergarten
classes, as well as a school wide set of approximately 200 picture books that tied
specific math core concepts to literacy curriculum for cross curricular instruction. 
Incentives for students’ YPP and Acuity progress were purchased and given out at the end
of the year.
3. c Explanation for the carry over to 2007-2008, if it was more than half of the available funds.
   
 
This text box is not applicable.
4. This is what the School Community Council or Trust Lands Committee planned to do and how they planned for the money to be spent.
 
   We will continue to use trust land funds to provide teachers with the instructional
tools they require.  
..We will purchase a new mathematics program or supplemental math materials to assist in
implementing the district and state math curriculum.
..We will purchase materials for classroom and school leveled libraries to support
teacher efforts in differentiating instruction.
   We will hire 4-5 aides to provide student tutoring support in reading.  We will
provide professional development in reading, focusing on small group instruction and
collaboration between our reading specialist, resource teachers, aides, and classroom
teachers.
4. a This is a report of what the school did and how the funds were spent to improve student academic performance.
   
 
1.  Provided substitutes for teachers to attend professional development in math and
literacy leadership.
2.  Purchased math manipulatives and provided materials for literacy leadership.
3.  Purchased supplies to implement literacy leadership program.
4.  Hired three classroom aides to support literacy and math instruction.



5. These are the committee's specific goals for student improvement entered in the plan.
 
   Students will demonstrate mastery of Utah Core Curriculum in language arts by showing
growth in the number of students reaching grade level reading skills in fluency, phonemic
awareness, and phonics by 5% as measured by those reaching DIBELS benchmarks in each of
the tested areas.  
   Students will demonstrate mastery of Utah Core Curriculum in math by showing growth on
quarterly math assessments, reaching a score of at least 70% on each post test.  They will
also demonstrate mastery of basic math computation facts, developing fluency with
multiplication/division facts by the end of fourth grade and addition/subtraction facts by
the end of second grade. 
5. a This is a report of how the goals were achieved.
   
 
Students on average, increased their DIBELS reading levels by 15%.  This exceeded our
goal.  Due to the change from the Quarterly Benchmarks to the Acuity program, we were
not
able to collect the necessary data to see if we reached the 70%.  However, we did
increase
our literacy and numeracy CRT scores by 10% and made AYP by Safe Harbor.
6. The following is how the committee planned to measure/assess academic improvement.
 
We will measure academic improvement through use of the CRT, Granite District Quarterly
Math Assessment, DIBELS, informal assessment of math facts mastery, math computation
skills, and reading skills.  We are also capturing data on independent reading outside of
school to measure the amount of practice they devote to their reading skills and the
extent to which we are encouraging and developing reading enjoyment.  
6. a This is a report on how academic improvement was measured/assessed.
   
 
Many assessments were used to measure students’ progress.  Individual classroom
assessments were used as well as school-wide, district, and state assessments.  The
first
week of school, every Kindergarten student was tested individually.  The same test was
given to each student at the end of the year to show growth.  Our Kindergarten students
had over a 70 % growth during the year.  Trust Land funds were used to purchase AR
(Accelerated Reading) tests.  Students read books according to their assessed reading
level and then took a specific test for that book.  This was intended to measure
comprehension.  In combination, the STAR reading tests measured reading levels and
growth
throughout the year.  Weekly YPP (Yearly Progress Pro) tests were taken by every student
in grades one through six in reading, language arts, and math to show progress. 
Quarterly
math benchmark tests were given in grades one through six.  During the year this program
changed over to a computer based program called Acuity.  It also measured growth in
math,
according to our district’s math map.  Using DIBELS, reading fluency was formally tested
three times during the year by a team of trained staff members, including the classroom
teacher.  Students’ scores placed them into three categories:  Benchmark – students on
or
above grade level, Strategic – approaching grade level, or At Risk – below grade level. 
Students scoring in the At Risk levels received weekly progress monitoring assessments. 
Students in the Strategic level received bi-weekly progress monitoring.  End of year
testing, or the CRT tests were taken by all students in grades two through six.  Grades
three through six were taken on the computer, while second grade took the tests with
paper
and pencils.  Our school passed the AYP (Adequate Yearly Progress) as mandated by the
NCLB
(No Child Left Behind) legislation. CRT. Acuity, YPP, AR, STAR, and DIBELS assessments
were used to measure progress.
7. In the school plan, there was an opportunity to explain how additional funds, exceeding the estimated distribution, would be spent. The following is what was reported.
 
Should additional funds be available we will add to our efforts to provide additional
instructional support through the use of aides.  We are also seeking opportunities to
provide students better access to quality literature through expanding our building and
classroom libraries.  
7. a This is a description of how the additional funds were spent.
   
 
In addition to our classroom aides, we hired an aide for our computer lab.  The aide
coordinated the assessments for teachers and students and provided teachers with support
for assigning individual student exercises in areas needing remediation.  She also
coordinated self-monitoring tools for students to chart their progress.
8. This is how the plan relates to the School Improvement Plan.
 
Our Trust Lands plan supports our school improvement plan directly.  Trust Lands funds
support teacher instructional efforts to intervene on behalf of students who are not
experiencing success by providing materials, professional development and aide assistance.
 We are using the same assessment methods and tools. Goals are the same, target
populations are the same, and areas of concern are the same.  The primary focus of our
school improvement plan is teacher directed interventions that provide additional
instructional contact with those students who are not making adequate yearly progress as
measured by state testing, district testing, and school and teacher informal assessment.  
   
9. The amount and source of additional funds, matching or grants, used to implement the plan.
 

Source: 
  
10. The school plan was advertised to the community in the following ways:

 
District and State USOE websites
11. Policy makers with whom the school has communicated about the program.
 
  • Dist. 12 -- Brent Goodfellow
  • Dist. 32 -- Ron Bigelow

2008-2009 School Plan

1. Have you shown the new DVD, A Matter of Trust, to the council/committee?
  Yes
2. School's identified most critical need(s) addressed in this plan:
Please check only the primary area(s). Improvement in some academic areas may improve all other academic areas but if the goal is to improve reading or technology, only check that area.
 

Mathematics

Reading

3. Briefly describe the School LAND Trust Plan.
  Academic Goals:
Enter specific academic goal(s) Whittier EL has set to improve student performance with School LAND Trust money, please do not include other funding sources.
 
	We will increase the number of students reaching Benchmark Level in the DIBELS testing by 5% at the
mid year testing as compared to the beginning test. 
	We will increase the number of students reaching Benchmark Level in the DIBELS testing by 10% at
the year end testing as compared to the beginning test.  
	We will have 85% of our students show an increase between the pre and post testing on each of our
District Math Benchmark testing periods.  

  Planned Steps:
Describe in detail the steps Whittier EL will take to reach each goal. Describe specific actions (Hire a remediation reading teacher, purchase microscopes for AP Biology class, provide professional development to improve writing instruction) that will be taken to achieve the goal. In short, please provide a road map to success.
 
We will use the $28283 carry over funds to hire a YPP lab aide who will assist students and teachers
with the weekly YPP testing and the quarterly Acuity testing.	We will also use LAND Trust funds to
provide monthly substitutes for each grade level to meet and collaborate two hours monthly to study
and analyze the data from DIBELS, YPP, and Acuity Testing.  This will help the teachers to
colloborate together in order to analyze the needs of students and differentiate instruction to meet
those needs.  
	We will also use funds to provide up to four aides for grades K-3.  These aides will help
facilitate the push-in instructional model by collaborating with the classroom teacher and reading
specialist to work with identified students in small group settings to reach the goal of increasing
scores by 10% by the end of the year. The aides will also work with students to increase their math
scores. 
	We will continue to update our reading and math curriculum and math manipulatives to allow the
teachers to use the most recent resources available. We will also provide inservice trainings for
staff members to implement those resources.  

  Measuring Progress toward goals:
Which beginning and ending measurements is Whittier EL going to use to measure progress towards each goal? The same measurement (test scores, number of library books checked out, informal teaching assessment, etc) must be used so results can be compared. What is the target to be achieved?
 
	Success will be measured by ongoing testing using the DIBELS program for the reading and language
arts skills and the District Math Benchmark testing for the math skills.  We will also use weekly
YPP testing in language arts, reading, and math to show progress for each student.  
	As we analyze the data for each student, teachers will be able to individualize their teaching for
individual student needs.  This will enable students to continually progress on their level.  

  Plans for expenditures of increased distribution:
The 2008 - 2009 distribution is an estimate. If the actual distribution is more than the estimate, how will the school expand progress towards goals with an increased distribution? Please provide an adequate explanation of academic use so that it will not be necessary to go back to the school board for approval to expend an increased distribution.
 
	If additional funds become available they will be used to provide more aide time or small group
instruction of students.   

4. How does this plan relate to the school improvement/strategic plan?
 
	All aspects of the LAND Trust plan fulfill a part of the School Student Improvement Plan.  Our
overall goal is to get students to Benchmark Level in all areas in all grade levels.  By reaching
Benchmark students will have the knowledge they need to pass the CRT tests and the end of the year. 
 
5. Financial Proposal
 
ESTIMATED Carry Over from 2007-2008 (automatically entered from Progress Report) $28283
ESTIMATED Distribution in 2008-2009 $35296
Total ESTIMATED Available Funds 2008-2009 $63579
Salaries and Employee Benefits (100 and 200) $45000
benefits $0
Professional Development and Technical Services (300) $10000
Repairs and Maintenance (430) $0
Other Purchased Services (Travel / Admission / Printing) (500) $0
General Supplies (610, 630 and 733) $0
Textbooks (641) $5000
Library Books / Periodicals / Audiovisual (644, 645, 646) $0
Periodicals $0
Audiovisual $0
Software / Technology related Hardware / Other Equipment (670, 734, 739) $1000
Furniture $0
Technology Related Hardware and Other Equipment $0
ESTIMATED Total Spent in 2008-2009 (automatically calculated) $61000
ESTIMATED Carry Over to 2009-2010 (automatically calculated) $2579
  Please explain any planned expenditures in General Supplies.
Please include each general category with the associated dollar amounts.
 
This question is not applicable. 
  If you plan to Carry Over more than one third of your distribution, please explain below.
 
This question is not applicable.
6. If Whittier EL has used School LAND Trust funds to acquire matching grants or donations, please explain below.
  Amount:
  $0
  Sources:
 
7. How will the plan and results be publicized to your community? (Please check all that apply)
If you would like stickers or a stamp to identify School LAND Trust purchases such as books or computers, click here to request them or send an email to karen.rupp@schools.utah.gov.
 

Letters to State Senators, Representatives, Governor, Attorney General, State Treasurer, and Congressional Delegation

School newsletter

School assembly

School website

  Other: Please Explain.
 
8. In order for schools to receive School LAND Trust Program funds, councils (Trust Land Committees for Charter Schools) must follow the law and State Board Rule. You may view the State Board Rule for Charter Schools by clicking here School Community Council Law by clicking here and the School LAND Trust Program Law by clicking here. To assure that the law has been followed, answer the following questions by clicking Yes or No. All "No" answers require an explanation in the box provided below. NOTE for Charter Schools: Only the second question (the underlined portion) and the last question apply, though you may still need to provide a brief explanation for "No" answers to avoid getting an error message.
 
Notification was provided two weeks in advance of elections for the School Community Council. Yes
Parents were elected by parents or when there were unfilled positions, the parent members on the council appointed parent members to fill the positions. Yes
Employees were elected by employees or when there were unfilled positions, the employee members on the council appointed employee members to fill the positions. Yes
The public is welcome to attend meetings and notice is provided so they can participate, including posting an agenda on the door of the school beginning the day before each meeting. Minutes of all meetings are being kept. Yes
  Explain any 'No' answers.